{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"La Tribune de l&#8217;Art","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.latribunedelart.com","title":"Why the Bayeux Tapestry cannot (and must not) travel","author_name":"Didier Rykner","width":"800","height":"600","url":"https:\/\/www.latribunedelart.com\/Why-the-Bayeux-Tapestry-cannot-and-must-not-travel","html":"\u003Ch4 class='title'\u003E\u003Ca href='https:\/\/www.latribunedelart.com\/Why-the-Bayeux-Tapestry-cannot-and-must-not-travel'\u003EWhy the Bayeux Tapestry cannot (and must not) travel\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/h4\u003E\u003Cblockquote class='spip'\u003E\u003Cp\u003EPresident Macron has once again made a disastrous decision for heritage&nbsp;: he has decided, entirely on his own, against the advice of the curators and conservators who know the Bayeux Tapestry, to lend it to England.\u003Cbr class='autobr' \/\u003E\nWe conducted an in-depth investigation on this matter seven years ago, when it was first raised, and published [this article]. We are bringing it back to the forefront (and translating it into English) because, for now, we have little to add.\u003Cbr class='autobr' \/\u003E\nWe will, of course, investigate this affair again and return to it shortly.\u003C\/p\u003E\u003C\/blockquote\u003E\n"}